Supreme Court Upholds Zero-Cost Preventive-Care Rule

Summary

In Kennedy v. Braidwood, the Supreme Court affirmed HHS’s USPSTF appointment power, keeping the ACA’s no-cost preventive-service mandate fully in force.

On June 26, the US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management that reversed a Fifth Circuit ruling and held that members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) are “inferior officers” who may be appointed by—and remain removable by—the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In the majority opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh emphasized that the Secretary holds the power to review and countermand any USPSTF recommendations, placing the task force squarely under executive supervision, satisfying the Appointments Clause.  

In the ruling, the Supreme Court states “The Executive Branch under both President Trump and President Biden has argued that the Preventive Services Task Force members are inferior officers and therefore may be appointed by the Secretary of HHS. We agree. The Task Force members are removable at will by the Secretary of HHS, and their recommendations are reviewable by the Secretary before they take effect.” 

Background on USPSTF 

USPSTF is an independent panel of 16 experts appointed by the HHS Secretary that voluntarily provide recommendations on preventive services for adults and children provided in or referred from the primary care setting. According to the USPSTF procedure manual, the Task Force evaluates specific interventions and issues recommendation with a letter grade (A, B, C, D, or Insufficient [I] statement) based on the strength of existing evidence and the net benefits of a preventive service. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), services that receive a USPSTF Grade A or Grade B must be covered by Medicare and third-party insurance carriers without member cost sharing. 

Legal Challenges to Preventive Services Coverage Mandate 

In September 2022, the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling in Braidwood Management Inc. vs. Becerra, a case which challenged the legality of the ACA’s preventive services coverage mandate under the US Constitution and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The court ruled that health plans are not required to cover services recommended by the USPSTF because its panel members are not properly appointed under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. Following the decision, the Biden administration appealed the court’s ruling to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 

In June 2024, the court of appeals issued a decision reversing the lower court’s decision to vacate all agency actions to enforce preventive care coverage mandates. However, the appellate ruling agreed with the lower court’s ruling that the USPSTF panel had not been validly appointed under the Appointments Clause.  

The case was appealed to the Supreme Court and on April 21, 2025, justices heard oral arguments in Kennedy vs. Braidwood Management Inc 

Why the Ruling Matters 

The ruling preserves the ACA requirement that commercial and employer health plans cover USPSTF Grade A or Grade B recommendations without cost-sharing. The decision averts an immediate disruption to no-cost coverage for over fifty types of screenings, prevention medication, and counseling recommendations. This ruling maintains frictionless access to preventive screening without introducing additional cost sharing for patients. Importantly, the Supreme Court’s reasoning also reinforces the legal foundation for other HHS-appointed expert bodies like the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which similarly issue coverage-influencing recommendations without Senate confirmation—an increasingly important precedent as public attention grows around new member appointments, transparency, and the scope of advisory authority.  

Next Steps 

Avalere Health’s cross functional team is uniquely capable of supporting stakeholders navigating the evolving landscape of USPSTF recommendations and submission processes. Understanding the access landscape for screening requires a partner with strategic foresight and deep expertise in evidence, policy, and quality frameworks. Leveraging expertise in evidence generation and planning, market strategy, and policy shaping, Avalere Health can provide strategic recommendations that meet individual client needs. To learn more about how Avalere Health can assist you connect with us. 

From beginning to end, our team synergy
produces measurable results. Let's work together.

Sign up to receive more insights about Federal and State Policy
Please enter your email address to be notified when new Federal and State Policy insights are published.

Back To Top